Kategori: Allmänt

  • Historien bakom Almedalen

    Dags för Almedalsveckan i Visby igen. Något inte alla känner till är att Almedalen har fått sitt namn efter en svensk politiker som hette Olof P. Almedalen, i folkmun ”Olof Palme”. Han började sommarprata i en park i Visby som ett svar på att ha nekats av P1 tre år i rad. Passiv aggressiv elegans.

    För att hylla Olof P. så lät man 1971 hugga ner alla lönnar i parken, som fram till dess hade kallats Lönndalen (efter sångaren Lasse Lönndahl), och ersätta dem med almar. Detta har kommit att kallas Almstriden. I samband med detta byggdes även Blå linjen.

    (Ett mer okänt faktum är att Olof P. Almedalens kusin, Kal P Dal, också grundade en politisk vecka. Kalpedalsveckan i Arlöv slog dock aldrig igenom på samma sätt.)

    En vanlig missuppfattning är att Almedalsveckan egentligen heter Psalmedalsveckan och ska ha grundats av Kristdemokraterna som en högläsningsstund ur bibeln. Av ekonomiska skäl tog man dock bort bokstäverna p och s för att spara bläck i sina reklambroschyrer.

  • 5 saker du kan göra med anledning av Rysslands krig mot Ukraina

    5 saker du kan göra med anledning av Rysslands krig mot Ukraina

    Jag är ingen militärstrategisk expert. Inte heller en politisk eller diplomatisk. Så jag ska undvika spekulation kring vad som skett, sker och framför allt kommer att ske i Ukraina och Ryssland.

    Däremot vill jag uppmana till detta:

    1. Stötta det ukrainska folket och/eller staten med vad du kan. Det pågår insamlingar av t.ex. kläder, djurmat och medicinsk utrustning på flera ställen i Sverige. Du kan också skänka pengar till någon av de erfarna hjälporganisationer som finns på plats. UNICEF, Röda Korset och Läkare utan gränser är säkra kort. Vill du stötta de ukrainska styrkorna direkt så kan du göra det här (laddar segt, men det finns möjlighet till kortbetalning).

    2. Engagera dig! Att bli månadsgivare är inte att engagera sig, det är att betala andra för att de ska engagera sig. Gå med i civilförsvarsförbundet eller hemvärnet. Gå med i ett parti. Bli fotbollstränare eller klassförälder. Gör något som gör att du bidrar till ett starkt, godhjärtat och sammansvetsat samhälle. Det kommer också att ge dig ett värdefullt och viktigt sammanhang i tuffa tider, och dessutom förbereda dig för dem.

    3. Se över din egen beredskap. Alla svenskar har ett eget ansvar att klara sig själva i 1 vecka i händelse av kris. Klarar du dig om elen går och vattnet slutar rinna? Har du en vevradio så att du kan ta del av viktig samhällsinformation? Vatten, värme och information är minimum, därefter mat. (Nej, jag tycker inte att du ska vara rädd för kärnvapenhot. Däremot kan IT-attacker slå ut samhällsviktiga system som elnät, mobilnät och internet.) Ha koll på eventuell krigsplacering. Må så bra du kan.

    4. Var källkritisk. Läs på. Dela inte overifierat innehåll från okända källor, eller källor som vi vet historiskt stått Ryssland nära (flera s.k. sverigevänliga låtsasnyhetssidor tex). Dela absolut inte propaganda. Dela inte spekulationer som kan skapa oro. Dela inte information om militärens rörelser eller övningar på sociala medier. Rapportera misstänkt verksamhet till Polisen.

    5. Se över ditt företags IT-skydd. Här är en enkel och effektiv åtgärdslista lånad från Niels Paarup-Petersen:

    Text med tio frågor att ställa till din IT-avdelning
  • Klarar du normal ränta?

    Som det slumpade sig, har jag blivit att följa en budgivning på en villa i närheten av oss här i Falun. Den ligger i Krondiket med utsikt över världsarvet och Falun, vilket såklart bidrar, men 111 kvm lades ut för 2.875.000 och är i skrivande stund uppe i 4.680.000 och det är nog inte klart där. Och det fick mig att börja tänka, vilket sen fick mig att skriva det här.

    Vi befinner oss sedan flera år tillbaka i en exceptionell situation. Finanskrisen ledde till negativa eller åtminstone låga räntor som aldrig hängde med upp i återhämtningen. Räntevapnet är avfyrat, som det heter. Sen kom pandemin, men inte ens den kunde hindra bostadsmarknaden från att stiga. Här i Dalarna eldades marknaden på av höginkomsttagare som plötsligt inte kunde flyga på semester och istället hade pengar över till att köpa ett fritidshus (Malung Sälen har sett ganska vansinniga uppgångar, Älvdalen med, tex.). Hemvändare som hängt med i Stockholms bostadsmarknad kan driva upp priset på villor, vilket fått bostadsrätter att följa med och Falun är en av de kommuner i länet där priserna stigit mest.

    Medellönen i Dalarnas län är 284’000 kr per år (vilket sätter oss på plats 16/21 län) vilket också är i nivå med våra villapriser (16/21). I Falun är medelinkomsten högre än i Dalarna: 304’000. Istället för genomsnittliga 2.058.000 kr får man här betala 3.330.000 kr för en villa. Så lönerna är 7 % högre medan villapriserna är 62 % högre. Svettigt.

    Och vi ponerar att man är två arbetande vuxna när man köper en villa för 5 mkr (banken kräver ju nästan alltid det då). Då är disponibel inkomst någonstans kring 33.000 kr beroende på ev. barnbidrag, medlemskap i kyrkan etc. Vi kan också ponera att åtminstone en av de vuxna tjänar över snittet för, tja, det brukar de som köper villor helt enkelt göra. Vi sätter disponibel inkomst till 38’000 vilket råkar vara exakt vad jag och min fru har.

    Den genomsnittliga belåningsgraden på nya bolån var i snitt 72 % 2020 enligt FI, varav ca 5 % av låntagarna låg på över 85 % (dvs. de använde blancolån som (del)finansiering av kontantinsatsen).

    I nuvarande miljö är amorteringskravet tillfälligt slopat. Det innebär att paret som köpt hus för 5 mkr och har kanske 1,30 % ränta, behöver betala 5400 kr till banken varje månad ovanpå en driftkostnad på, säg, 4000 kr/månad.

    9400 kr, av 38’000. Det är ett ganska gott liv och billigt boende!

    Men, klarar man 3 % ränta och en amortering? 5 %? Vi är inte där nu, och inte nästa år heller. Men vi bor där vi bor och många av oss flyttar åtminstone in med ambitionen att bo där ganska länge. Det finns ingenting som säger att räntan inte kan ligga på 3 % om fem år, eller 5 % om 10 år. Innan finanskrisen pendlade bolåneräntan mellan 5-6 %. Innan 1996 (alltså sannolikt under din livstid) var den tvåsiffrig.

    Och givet att du planerar att bo kvar i 10 år eller mer – klarar du 5 %?

    För enkelhetens skull räknar vi med att det nu gått 10 år. Vårt par har amorterat ner sina 72 % till 61 % och skulden är nu 2.031.000 kr. 7 %

     

    Vi får hoppas på inflationen…

     

  • A short lesson in perspective

    A short lesson in perspective

    2012 läste jag för första gången ett blogginlägg som fick mig att ifrågasätta, och över tid fortsätta våga ifrågasätta, min karriär och mina yrkesval. Det hette ”A short lesson in perspective” och var skrivet av Linds Redding. Han hade jobbat som Art Director på BBDO och Saatchi & Saatchi, men diagnosticerats med obotlig cancer. Hans ord och tankar berörde mig djupt, och jag återvänder till dem ett par gånger per år för att kalibrera min kompass.

    Hans blogg är idag nedtagen, han själv har gått bort, och texten finns bara kvar citerad på andra platser online. Jag vill återge den här med, dels för att själv ha den nära till hands, men också för att jag tycker det är ord som är värda att dela. Den är värd att bevaras, och jag hoppas att han hade sett det som ett hommage snarare än otillåten återpublicering. Här är den i alla fall:


    glaskula med bakgrund

    Many years ago, when I first started to work in the advertising industry, we used to have this thing called The Overnight Test. It worked like this: My creative partner Laurence and I would spend the day covering A2 sheets torn from layout pads with ideas for whatever project we were currently engaged upon – an ad for a new gas oven, tennis racket or whatever. Scribbled headlines. Bad puns. Stick-men drawings crudely rendered in fat black Magic Marker. It was a kind of brain dump I suppose. Everything that tumbled out of our heads and mouths was committed to paper. Anything completely ridiculous, irrelevant or otherwise unworkable was filtered out as we worked, and by beer ‘o’ clock there would be an impressive avalanche of screwed-up paper filling the corner of the room where our comically undersized waste-bin resided.

    On a productive day, aside from the mountain of dead trees (recycling hadn’t been invented in 1982), stacked polystyrene coffee cups and an overflowing ash-tray, there would also be a satisfying thick sheaf of ”concepts.” Some almost fully formed and self-contained ideas. Others misshapen and graceless fragments, but harbouring perhaps the glimmer of a smile or a grain of human truth which had won it’s temporary reprieve from the reject pile. Before trotting off to Clarks Bar to blow the froth of a pint of Eighty-Bob, our last task was to pin everything up on the walls of our office.

    Hangovers not withstanding, the next morning at the crack of ten ‘o’ clock we’d reconvene in our work-room and sit quietly surveying the fruits of our labour. Usually about a third of the ‘ideas’ came down straight away, before anyone else wandered past. It’s remarkable how something that seems either arse-breakingly funny, or cosmically profound in the white heat of it’s inception, can mean absolutely nothing in the cold light of morning. By mid-morning coffee, the creative department was coming back to life, and we participated in the daily ritual of wandering around the airy Georgian splendour of our Edinburgh offices and critiquing each teams crumpled creations. It wasn’t brutal or destructive. Creative people are on the whole fragile beings, and letting each other down gently and quietly was the unwritten rule. Sometimes just a blank look or a scratched head was enough to see a candidate quietly pulled down and consigned to the bin. Something considered particularly ”strong,” witty or clever would elicit cries of “Hey, come and see what the boys have come up with!” Our compadres would pile into our cramped room to offer praise or constructive criticism. That was always a good feeling.

    This human powered bullshit filter was a handy and powerful tool. Inexpensive, and practically foolproof. Not much slipped through the net. I’m quite sure architects, musicians, mathematicians and cake decorators all have an equivalent time-honed protocol.

    But here’s the thing.

    The Overnight Test only works if you can afford to wait overnight. To sleep on it.

    Time moved on, and during the nineties technology overran, and transformed the creative industry like it did most others. Exciting new tools. Endless new possibilities. Pressing new deadlines. With the new digital tools at our disposal we could romp over the creative landscape at full tilt. Have an idea, execute it and deliver it in a matter of a few short hours. Or at least a long night. At first it was a great luxury. We could cover so much more ground. Explore all the angles. And having exhausted all the available possibilities, craft a solution we could have complete faith in.

    Or as the bean counters upstairs quickly realised, we could just do three times as many jobs in the same amount of time, and make them three times as much money. For the same reason that Jumbo Jets don’t have the grand pianos and palm-court cocktail bars we were originally promised in the brochures, the accountants naturally won the day.

    Pretty soon, The Overnight Test became the Over Lunch Test. Then before we knew it, we were eating Pot-Noodles at our desks, and taking it in turns to go home and see our kids before they went to bed. As fast as we could pin an idea on the wall, some red-faced account manager in a bad suit would run away with it. Where we used to rely on taking a break and ”stretching the eyes” to allow us to see the wood from the trees (too many idioms and similes? Probably), we now fell back on experience and gut-feel. It worked most of the time, but nobody is infallible. Some howlers and growlers definitely made it through, and generally standards plummeted.

    The other consequence, with the benefit of hindsight, is that we became more conservative. Less likely to take creative risks and rely on the tried and trusted. The familiar is always going to research better than the truly novel. And research was the new god.

    The trick to being truly creative, I’ve always maintained, is to be completely unselfconscious. To resist the urge to self-censor. To not-give-a-shit what anybody thinks. That’s why children are so good at it. And why people with Volkswagens, and mortgages, Personal Equity Plans and matching Lois Vutton luggage are not.

    It takes a certain amount of courage, thinking out loud. And is best done in a safe and nurturing environment. Creative departments and design studios used to be such places, where you could say and do just about anything creatively speaking, without fear of ridicule or judgement. It has to be this way, or you will just close up like a clamshell. It’s like trying to have sex, with your mum listening outside the bedroom door. Can’t be done. Then some bright spark had the idea of setting everyone up in competition. It became a contest. A race. Winner gets to keep his job.

    Now of course we are all suffering from the same affliction. Our technology whizzes along at the velocity of a speeding electron, and our poor overtaxed neurons struggle to keep up. Everything has become a split-second decision. Find something you like. Share it. Have a half-baked thought. Tweet it. Don’t wait. Don’t hesitate. Seize the moment. Keep up. There will be plenty of time to repent later. Oh, and just to cover your ass, don’t forget to stick a smiley on the end just in case you’ve overstepped the mark.

    So. To recap, The Overnight Test is a good thing. And sadly missed. A weekend is even better, and as they fell by the wayside, they were missed too. ”If you don’t come in on Saturday, don’t bother turning up on Sunday!” as the old advertising joke goes.

    A week would be nice. A month would be an unreasonable luxury. I’ve now ‘enjoyed’ the better part of six months of enforced detachment from my old reality. When you’re used to turning on a sixpence, shooting from the hip, dancing on a pin-head (too many again?), the view back down from six months is quite giddying. And sobering.

    My old life looks, and feels, very different from the outside.

    Perhaps am not alone in this assessment. Many people have their own idea of a person’s life, without knowing what really goes on, on the inside. Some even envy the lives of their friends and colleagues, without realising, their lives are much better. Now that am out of that life, am able to have a different perspective of my old life.

    And here’s the thing.

    It turns out I didn’t actually like my old life nearly as much as I thought I did. I know this now because I occasionally catch up with my old colleagues and work-mates. They fall over each other to enthusiastically show me the latest project they’re working on. Ask my opinion. Proudly show off their technical prowess (which is not inconsiderable). I find myself glazing over but politely listen as they brag about who’s had the least sleep and the most takaway food. “I haven’t seen my wife since January, I can’t feel my legs anymore and I think I have scurvy, but another three weeks and we’ll be done. It’s got to be done by then, the client’s going on holiday. What do you think?”

    What do I think?

    I think you’re all fucking mad. Deranged. So disengaged from reality it’s not even funny. It’s a fucking TV commercial. Nobody gives a shit.

    This has come as quite a shock I can tell you. I think I’ve come to the conclusion that the whole thing was a bit of a con. A scam. An elaborate hoax.

    The scam works like this:

    • The creative industry operates largely by holding ‘creative’ people ransom to their own self-image, precarious sense of self-worth, and fragile – if occasionally out of control ego. We tend to set ourselves impossibly high standards, and are invariably our own toughest critics. Satisfying our own lofty demands is usually a lot harder than appeasing any client, who in my experience tend to have disappointingly low expectations. Most artists and designers I know would rather work all night than turn in a sub-standard job. It is a universal truth that all artists think they are frauds and charlatans, and live in constant fear of being exposed. We believe by working harder than anyone else we can evade detection. The bean-counters rumbled this centuries ago and have been profitably exploiting this weakness ever since. You don’t have to drive creative folk like most workers. They drive themselves. Just wind ‘em up and let ‘em go.
    • Truly creative people tend not to be motivated by money. That’s why so few of us have any. The riches we crave are acknowledgment and appreciation of the ideas that we have and the things that we make. A simple but sincere “That’s quite good.” from someone who’s opinion we respect (usually a fellow artisan) is worth infinitely more than any pay-rise or bonus. Again, our industry masters cleverly exploit this insecurity and vanity by offering glamorous but worthless trinkets and elaborately staged award schemes to keep the artists focused and motivated. Like so many demented magpies we flock around the shiny things and would peck each others eyes out to have more than anyone else. Handing out the odd gold statuette is a whole lot cheaper than dishing out stock certificates or board seats.
    • The compulsion to create is unstoppable. It’s a need that has to be filled. I’ve barely ‘worked’ in any meaningful way for half a year, but every day I find myself driven to ‘make’ something. Take photographs. Draw. Write. Make bad music. It’s just an itch than needs to be scratched. Apart from the occasional severed ear or descent into fecal-eating dementia the creative impulse is mostly little more than a quaint eccentricity. But introduce this mostly benign neurosis into a commercial context… well, that way, my friends, lies misery and madness.

    This hybridisation of the arts and business is nothing new of course – it’s been going on for centuries – but they have always been uncomfortable bed-fellows. But even artists have to eat, and the fuel of commerce and industry is innovation and novelty. Hey! Let’s trade. “Will work for food!” as the street-beggar’s sign says.

    This Faustian pact has been the undoing of many great artists, many more journeymen, and more than a few of my good friends. Add to this volatile mixture the powerful accelerant of emerging digital technology and all hell breaks loose. What I have witnessed happening in the last twenty years is the aesthetic equivalent of the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century. The wholesale industrialisation and mechanistation of the creative process. Our ad agencies, design groups, film and music studios, have gone from being cottage industries and guilds of craftsmen and women, essentially unchanged from the middle-ages, to dark satanic mills of mass production. Ideas themselves have become just another disposable commodity to be supplied to order by the lowest bidder. As soon as they figure out a way of outsourcing thinking to China they won’t think twice. Believe me.

    So where does that leave the artists and artisans? Well, up a watercolour of shit creek without a painbrush. That one thing that we prize and value above all else – the idea – turns out to be just another plastic gizmo or widget to be touted and traded. And to add insult to injury we now have to create them not in our own tine, but according to the quota and the production schedule. ”We need six concepts to show the client first thing in the morning, he’s going on holiday. Don’t waste too much time on them though, it’s only meeting-fodder. He’s only paying for one so they don’t all have to be good, just knock something up. You know the drill. Oh, and one more thing. His favourite colour is green. Rightho! See you in the morning then… I’m off to the Groucho Club.”

    Have you ever tried to have an idea. Any idea at all, with a gun to your head? This is the daily reality for the creative drone. And when he’s done, sometime in the wee small hours, he then has to face his two harshest critics. Himself, and everyone else. ”Ah. Sorry. Client couldn’t make the meeting. I faxed your layouts to him at his squash club. He quite liked the green one. Apart from the typeface, the words, the picture and the idea. Oh, and could the logo be bigger? Hope it wasn’t a late night. Thank god for computers eh? Rightho! I’m off to lunch.”

    Alright, it’s not bomb disposal. But in it’s own way it’s dangerous and demanding work. And as I’ve said, the rewards tend to be vanishingly small. Plastic gold statuette anyone? I’ve seen quite a few creative drones fall by the wayside over the years. Booze mostly. Drugs occasionally. Anxiety. Stress. Broken marriages. Lots of those. Even a couple of suicides. But mostly just people temperamentally and emotionally ill-equipped for such a hostile and toxic environment. Curiously, there never seems to be any shortage of eager young worker drones queuing up to try their luck, although I detect that even their bright-eyed enthusiasm is staring to wane. Advertising was the sexy place to be in the eighties. The zeitgeist has moved on. And so have most of the bright-young-things.

    So how did I survive for thirty years? Well it was a close shave. Very close. And while on the inside I am indeed a ‘delicate flower’ as some creative director once wryly observed, I have enjoyed until recently, the outward physical constitution and good health of an ox. I mostly hid my insecurity and fear from everyone but those closest to me, and ran fast enough that I would never be found out. The other thing I did, I now discover, was to convince myself that there was nothing else, absolutely nothing, I would rather be doing. That I had found my true calling in life, and that I was unbelievably lucky to be getting paid – most of the time – for something that I was passionate about, and would probably be doing in some form or other anyway.

    It turns out that my training and experience had equipped me perfectly for this epic act of self-deceit. This was my gig. My schtick. Constructing a compelling and convincing argument to buy, from the thinnest of evidence, was what we did. ”Don’t sell the sausage. Sell the sizzle” as we were taught at ad school.

    Countless late nights and weekends, holidays, birthdays, school recitals and anniversary dinners were willingly sacrificed at the altar of some intangible but infinitely worthy higher cause. It would all be worth it in the long run.

    This was the con. Convincing myself that there was nowhere I’d rather be was just a coping mechanism. I can see that now. It wasn’t really important. Or of any consequence at all, really. How could it be? We were just shifting product. Our product, and the clients’. Just meeting the quota. ”Feeding the beast” as I called it on my more cynical days.

    So was it worth it?

    Well, of course not. It turns out it was just advertising. There was no higher calling. No ultimate prize. Just a lot of faded, yellowing newsprint, and old video cassettes in an obsolete format I can’t play anymore, even if I was interested. Oh yes, and a lot of framed certificates and little gold statuettes. A shit-load of empty Prozac boxes, wine bottles, a lot of grey hair and a tumour of indeterminate dimensions.

    It sounds like I’m feeling sorry for myself again. I’m not. It was fun for quite a lot of the time. I was pretty good at it. I met a lot of funny, talented and clever people, got to become an overnight expert in everything from shower-heads to sheep-dip, got to scratch my creative itch on a daily basis, and earned enough money to raise the family that I love, and even see them occasionally.

    But what I didn’t do, with the benefit of perspective, is anything of any lasting importance. At least creatively speaking. Economically I probably helped shift some merchandise. Enhanced a few companies bottom lines. Helped make one or two wealthy men a bit wealthier than they already were.

    As a life, it all seemed like such a good idea at the time.

    But I’m not really sure it passes The Overnight Test.

    Pity.

    Oh. And if your reading this while sitting in some darkened studio or edit suite agonising over whether ”housewife A” should pick up the soap powder with her left hand or her right, do yourself a favour — power down, lock up, and go home and kiss your wife and kids.

  • Skillnaden mellan offentlig och privat verksamhet

    Skillnaden mellan offentlig och privat verksamhet kan enkelt beskrivas såhär:

    Offentlig verksamhet – shit happens

    I offentlig verksamhet kan du åka till Cannes och köpa, säg, en klänning som du drar av som restaurangrepresentation genom att ta klänningskvittot och skriva dit ett dricksbelopp på det. Du kan också köpa crémant och delikatesser som du drar av utan att ha kvitto, och få igenom att du hyrt en bil i 10 dagar fast affärsbesöket bara vara 4 dagar långt.

    Du handlar med skattepengar, eller kort och gott andras pengar.

    När detta sedan uppdagas kan du säga att det har skett misstag, att det var mycket tråkigt och att du ska jobba för att det inte ska hända igen.

    Privat verksamhet – sayonara

    I privat verksamhet kan du också åka till Cannes och köpa, säg, en klänning som du drar av som restaurangrepresentation genom att ta klänningskvittot och skriva dit ett dricksbelopp på det. Du kan också köpa crémant och delikatesser som du drar av utan att ha kvitto, och få igenom att du hyrt en bil i 10 dagar fast affärsbesöket bara vara 4 dagar långt.

    Du handlar med företagets pengar.

    När detta sedan uppdagas väntar rättegång för trolöshet mot huvudman och återbetalningsskyldighet om du är anställd, alternativt grovt bokföringsbrott och näringsförbud om du är ägare.

    Accountability

    Accountability är ett himla fint ord som inte riktigt låter sig översättas från engelskan. Att härleda en handling till en person, att kunna ställa någon till svars, att man kort och gott ta sitt ansvar.

    Det är när det inte finns någon accountability som vi får finanskriser och kommunmygel. Där misstag dyker upp från tomma intet och det var ju tråkigt och vi ska göra vårt bästa…

    Som företagare har man alltid, oavsett vem som gjort vad, full accountability. Det är mig du ska prata med när något gått snett och jag kommer att ta mitt ansvar och fixa det – inte lägga på luren som Mats Andersson.

    Så förlåt mig om jag ibland har lite svårt för det kommunala.